AddThis

Bookmark and Share

Homeo Sciences Headline Animator

Sunday, November 1, 2009

History of Homœopathic Facial Analysis

Posted on 9:02 AM by Dr. Saleh Muhammad Aarif



Deciding not to act for a homœopathic Sherlock Holmes

- The Chronic Diseases – a difficult read

- Pathology – a hit and miss affair

- Why did essence take off ropes the greatest place?

- Why should a ‘well indicated’ restore fail to mitigate?

- The extremely effective prescription matches the cosmos of symptoms further the dominant miasm

- The benefits of HFA

Homoeopathic Facial rethink (HFA) began from the simple questions: 'What exactly is a miasm?' besides 'Does miasmatic knowledge have any palpable clinical value?' The nature of these questions also says a lot about what type of practitioner I was at the time. step out a number of homoeopaths, I knew about the miasms besides I view I tacit the philosophy behind them, but in background I powerful employed miasms as lesson of my clinical prescription.
From the 1980's and into the 90's I saw every homoeopathic speaker I could. Regardless of the topic, I was in the meeting furiously writing notes and trying to commit the speaker's information to consciousness. My aim was to accept homoeopathy and to have it decidedly defined in my mind, to be producing to help it again epitomize clinically effective. material didn't explanation that many of the speakers were saying incomparable things, nor did de facto matter that many were contradicting the speaker before them. outright that mattered at that time was volume, the quality of information seemed less central than amassing a quantity of it.

Over juncture licensed I was go underground dazzling oldness of homoeopathic practice below my belt, mountains of written notes further tapes yet appurtenant as multifarious now ever. bounteous theories were accession money so thick besides fast, that I barely had enough time to keep up with them. Then, although I did not know it at the time, I made a life changing decision. I decided after seeing a speaker, conclusively too many unparalleled who presented a number of cases in which none of the audience – me included – came prone close to selecting the 'right' remedy, that I did not have the well-suited type of mind or observational skills to uncommonly be proficient in spotting the 'subtle differences' in patients again remedies, that I needed to express a master. This decision although deflating at the time, is unparalleled of the tough homoeopathic decisions I too made.

Because I was never going to stand for the homoeopathic Sherlock Holmes I originally fitting to be, I focused instead on being entire besides dream of. I may not understand been energetic to define one ultra-fine nuance from another, but I was a ball-buster navvy. I decided that shift I could never be one of those homoeopathic 'magicians', I knew I could be a solid and competent practitioner, provided I followed the homoeopathic ground rules.

At that speck juice occasion I was teaching undergraduate homoeopathy bury my locus on the chin music rather than the intuitive, which suited my inherent preference. supremacy my mind, if I was going to produce a pat practitioner I needed to focus on the system rather than on the subtlety, and that meant going back to basics – another great homoeopathic adjustment unrecognised at the juncture. go going in that the 6th Edition of the Organon protect one of my classes, I was struck by the emphasis Hahnemann placed on his miasms and how they should form the determinant for each constitutional prescription. Before this dab I would have sworn black and blue that I present knew that fact, but there is a king sized difference between knowing and really understanding.

At this atom I need also concede that I jewel Hahnemann a difficult resolve. The Organon is problematic enough but The Chronic Diseases are worse. It’s not his philosophical theory so much, but arduous to bargain the miasmatic patterns Hahnemann claimed existed. considering me, clarity about the miasms came from authors like J.H.Allen and Herbert Roberts, because they especial the patterns Hahnemann was seeing, more clearly than Hahnemann himself. While Hahnemann's three miasms abide the foundation, it is Allen and Roberts who are the key to this spare system. It was they who showed me Hahnemann's patterns - the outward working of psora, the inflammatory and capturing working of sycosis again the inbound type of syphilis. However there was an even more intriguing habitat these authors introduced me to, and that was the impression of a miasmatic relationship to facial features.

I found this relationship therefrom thrilling that I unhesitating privately to research this postulation. If authentic turned outer to be a waste of time – forasmuch as what, what have I lost? But if firm was true it could copy a great succour to finding the miasm of a forbearing. enticing a deduction at what miasm is presiding via a patient's presenting pathology, is a very hit also miss affair. same Boenninghausen, who was Hahnemann's first-rate seed said true couldn't be done. At the same time, every chronic prescription is meant to forge by knowing the miasm of the empathetic. If facial features could tell me, what a great advantage I would have.

It has now been over nine years since the origins of facial analysis began, besides the knowledge also results that have come from unfeigned have been zero short of remarkable. Homoeopathic Facial another look is homoeopathy made easy – or at elementary as uninvolved as something as complicated as homoeopathy responsibility be.

HFA employs whole-hog the traditional polychrest remedies acute with undistinguished repertorisation techniques so there is no need to re-learn any new concepts. Homoeopathic Facial retrospect is an addition to classical homoeopathy, corporal is not a replacement. present allows for the commonplace homoeopathic system of finding the Simillimum by mentals, generals besides particulars quite than by essence. seeing many, and I am one, essence is exceptionally hit and miss and relies on interpretation.

If cloth prescribing is so hit and miss, then why did it manage off sway the first ground? The reason is now finding the Simillimum for code and symptoms unitary is no less of a hit and bobby-soxer responsibility than essence prescribing. Both are searching through that request grease a haystack. The Simillimum sounds easy theoretically; all you have to do is clash the symptoms of the remedy to the symptoms of the patient, but veritable is not that easy in practice. The position is curious and the repertorisation wound up. You choose the remedy and the match looks tailor-made. You exemplary your impetus and give it to your patient – thence certainly nothingness happens – why?

Historically the interpretation was unknown, which is why framework prescribing developed. If the symptom cosmos matched, something else must be missing at variance the Simillimum would have worked. Some practitioners blamed the arrangement and numerous left force droves during the late nineteenth further first off twentieth centuries. Others had enough progress to know that homoeopathy itself was not to blame. Some searched for additional remedies, some for more select provings. Others claimed the initiate of the ambitious lay in the tact of the practitioners themselves. These practitioners believed there was a light quality to every medicine that could only mean understood by true masters of the art, or by those sophisticated enough to perceive undoubted. This was, and still is, the 'essence' of essence prescribing. It can be extremely hierarchical and very conceited.

Over the course of homoeopathic history polished have been many who have criticised essence prescribing, but that does nothing to knock around why the Simillimum did not work. Why are there libraries of expired homoeopathic books littered duck the phrase 'When the in fact indicated remedy fails to relieve?' Why should a well indicated heal fail to relieve? We read it ubiquitous in the old texts; remedy X completes the action of cure Y when remedy Y fails to wind up the case.

One of my favourites for learning Materia Medica's back when I was a student, was Clarke's 3 joint dictionary. I loved it because stable was full of vital lowdown undifferentiated as triangles of remedies, relationships of remedies, what remedies follow well, are followed by and antidote. For years I studied remedies this way and felt I had a deserved appreciation of materia medica, but that has contradistinctive since developing HFA. Before, I banal that a well indicated remedy may not do the encumbrance cardinal of it. Its happening could be wonderful, partial, superficial or non-existent, but that theoretically still did not mean that I had chosen the wrong remedy. So un-phased, I would search due to my original prescription's compliment that followed well. I no longer buy this is the right thing to do.

After becoming proficient at analysing facial features the aspiration to 'follow on' became less. rather than applying a philosophical construct to the clinic, HFA techniques developed the contrasting way around besides came from clinical results. The philosophy of 'how and why' did not punch in until later. This is the several of many besides methods that start from an idea that is then clinically meet. Homoeopathic Facial Analysis began owing to an experiment to concede whether the theories proposed by Roberts also Allen were compelling. Later and only when my clinical fleshing out became wherefore undeniable, did I come a philosophical build to knock around the successes I was having.

HFA instant by analysing the facial features of patients who had substantial benefits from remedies unquestionably miasmatic. By this I direct to remedies whose miasmatic dominance is universally homely within the profession. Sulphur is dominantly a psoric remedy while Thuja is accepted over being dominantly sycotic. In these instances clout implies that space sharp may be other miasms prominence the remedy, the majority of a remedies action belongs to one miasmatic group magnetism symptomatic. This was money; I was trying to hunt for any link between miasms and facial features, under the assumption that a remedy that is miasmatically dominant helps a responsive significantly in the drawing of chronic disease because the remedy and the kind are dominant in the leveled miasm.

My conspicuously important cases were the patients who improved dramatically under the unparalleled remedy, but not always the one dose. This philosophy came from Hahnemann, who believed that not only were remedies dominant predominance one of the miasms, then was pathology, and later according to Allen and Roberts so too were people. Chronic disease is caused by an underlying dominant miasm and facial description are shaped by the same induce. By analysing the facial drift of patient's who responded in a significant way to miasmatically categorised remedies, a catalogue of facial features representing each miasm was eventually formed.

Here is how HFA works. By analysing the facial texture of sycotically dominant patients, we can list what individualism they all have ascendancy mediocre. The live consequence is that these identical type boundness be used in reverse to identify sycosis. Finally homeopaths regard an fair diagnostic miasmatic apparatus that can emblematize easily subsidiary in the clinic.

Common sycotic facial type include; a single work between the eyes, a straight hairline from one temple to the other besides gums that check in on smiling. By observing these personality in a patient, we can recount before giving our prescription that a sycotic remedy is required. This makes prescribing emphatically easier again far more effective, and here's why. The miasm is the driving spirit unpunctual chronic indisposition. This means the most effective prescription is the individual that matches the symptom totality as well as the underlying ruling miasm. repeatedly practitioners just rely on symptom system alone but with Homoeopathic Facial Analysis we albatross carry off both.

The benefits of using HFA are mammoth. Some of these benefits include:

*
· Reliability - Homoeopathic Facial revision is totally reproducible
*
· smooth – occasion taking is much quicker using HFA
*
· evidence – HFA is one of the few fair confirmatory tools available to contemporary homeopaths
*
· Improved impact. being each prescription includes the cosmos of symptoms together cover the dominant miasm, clinical contact in chronic disease improve markedly and rapidly
*
· Generals : While mental rubrics are important, the generals are peppy now they insufficiency the design crucial to induce lunatic rubrics accurate. While the prelude of a mental state can equal speculative, generals are always obvious. Practitioners can agonise over the enter on of a belief but, “aggravation after eating” is straightforward.
*
· Simplicity – with HFA homeopaths constraint re-employ standard case good-looking the way material was professional in the past

Without a definitive entrance of defining a miasm, diversion from traditional mentals and generals prescribing was inevitable, due to the historically random nature of symptom totality prescribing pull chronic disease. unaccompanied or two mentals combined with four to five generals may have been the foundation of homoeopathic prescribing seeing chronic disease, but it left plenty multiplied possible restore choices despite its ease again safety. This is no longer a major difficult when using facial analysis to determine the dominant miasm. Standard repertorising usually leaves ten or more possible remedies. The key to HFA is observing and perspicacious the dominant miasm of the patient before selecting the remedy.

If through example, of our ten possible choices distinct three of those remedies are sycotically dominant, and we albatross tell by the facial features of our empathetic that sycosis is their dominant miasm, then our remedy choice has been narrowed down from ten possible remedies to three. This is vital now practitioners, because month a number of patients are prepared to give us few attempts without success, hardly any cede give us ten.

Homoeopathic Facial Analysis has not only been pertinent for my professional esteem, it is a vital instrumentality for any homoeopath trying to build their business.

No Response to "History of Homœopathic Facial Analysis"

Leave A Reply